Source link : https://big-apple.news/2026/09/10/new-york-news/clancy-juror-says-holdout-did-not-present-single-piece-of-proof-explaining-vote/
A juror within the trial of Lindsay Clancy is sharing new particulars about what he stated occurred contained in the jury room that led to a mistrial within the case of the Massachusetts girl going through first-degree homicide fees for the 2023 deaths of her three younger youngsters.
Nick Dargie, one of many three males on the 12-person jury, informed ABC Information’ Aaron Katersky that the lone holdout juror who prevented a unanimous verdict didn’t present any proof explaining his vote.
“There was a number of instances I’d ask him to indicate us proof or, you realize, describe a witness testimony that helped to show what he was saying, and … he could not,” Dargie, 25, stated in an interview Wednesday.
ABC Information – PHOTO: : Nick Dargie, 25, a juror within the Lindsay Clancy trial, speaks with ABC Information’ Aaron Katersky on Sept. 9, 2026.
Jury deliberations finally yielded an 11-1 break up in favor of not responsible by cause of madness, however the remaining juror wouldn’t change his place favoring conviction, in line with different jurors who spoke out publicly.
Lindsay Clancy’s legal professional Kevin Reddington asks Trump for pardon after mistrial
“There wasn’t a single piece of proof or witness testimony that he used to show why he was pondering the best way he was, which is why we in the end despatched in that observe,” Dargie stated, referring to a observe the jury foreperson gave to Decide William Sullivan, resulting in the…
—-
Author : big-apple
Publish date : 2026-09-10 08:46:00
Copyright for syndicated content belongs to the linked Source.
—-
1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – 8